Vinod Khosla says:
"All the interesting things are happening on the edges of the system. They don't happen in the solid core."
Innovations that significantly change the world rarely come from big business,
academia or government.
Innovative thinking is needed to
1.Understanding the climate - understanding is missing
2.Solving the climate threat - innovation is missing
The more an idea changes things, the more it is discouraged.
What is most needed is also most resisted.
That's why climate work is heading straight into a wall of total imaginative futility.
What is needed to solve the climate crisis?
1. Greta : Study !
Everyone needs to understand what is happening
2. Johan Rockström:
Do everything in your power
WWF fundraising gala
3. There are solutions:
People should not have to worry about the climate crisis in the long term,
nor for rising electricity prices or fuel.
Nor should there be any climate anxiety.
The climate crisis can be solved in smart ways if the experts don't stop us...
By far the biggest hurdle is that the IPCC has given the world the wrong value for climate sensitivity (S=3)
which in turn misrepresents our critical climate situation. This could be classified as
as the worst crime ever committed against humanity because the value S=3 alone can
cause the end of civilization. Press, media and climate experts
are not taking their responsibility here. Powerful forces want to prevent a free, true, democratic
discussion in which all points of view are heard. After all, the truth will prevail in
in the very near future.
The climate crisis is solvable in clever ways unless the experts stop us...
Greta is absolutely right: ordinary people must take responsibility and by democratic means
bring forward the forces that can shape a climate policy based on truth.
One possible vision (of many!) is this house that uses nanotechnology to
take methane directly out of the air. A funnel with a diameter of 5 m and an air velocity
of 5 m/s can theoretically capture 6.5 kW from the methane in the air.
That's enough to generate all the electrical power for the house and it's enough to
fuel for the car. A car running on atmospheric methane reverses the greenhouse effect
100 times more powerfully than fossil fuel cars destroy it. Therefore, a single such
car can make 100 cars run on fossil fuels at the same time and the whole thing becomes climate neutral.
Now the price of diesel is soaring because so much bio-oil is being added.
A smoother solution would be to add 1% atmospheric methane,
then the fuel would be completely climate-neutral and the price of diesel could be lowered,
The next step is to add 2%.
Then the greenhouse effect will reverse and this fuel will outperform electric cars.
This shows how smooth and comfortable the transition to a new world can be.
It takes 100 million of these houses to provide 100 million families with ultra-high
living standards while solving the ENTIRE climate crisis within
within 20 years. With this calculator, everyone can play with the resources that
available in thin air www.ppm.today/air
All such new things arise "at the edges of the system" (Vinod Khosla)
and is furiously opposed by the entire establishment.
This proposal has already been presented at
Chalmers /General Assembly SIO Graphene April 2015.
The scientists gave the thumbs up and the Swedish Energy Agency swept everything under the carpet.
A successful project has the potential to solve Sweden's entire energy problem,
a large part of the world's climate problem (about 50%) and can at the same time be
Sweden's largest industrial project.
When projects become so promising that they change the world, this is high on the agenda
above the level of knowledge of current experts and professors. Therefore, such
furiously discouraged. That's why Vinod Khosla says.....if the experts don't stop us.
Hundreds of similar proposals must be released from "the edges of the system"
that can deliver.
Current climate policy Zero Emissions 2045 can solve 1% of the climate crisis if the whole world
steps up. Therefore, it is a cheating policy and an unimaginative insult to our own children.
A disgrace to humanity to try to cheat its way out of the biggest problem ever.
The choice is crystal clear: Remove all Groupthinkers from decision-making positions - or
or let civilization perish. The people must inform themselves and exercise the power
that emanates from the constitution.
4. Answers needed from climate experts:
The IPCC report is very important and the IPCC's work must be supported in all ways.
But that does not prevent certain conclusions from being subject to scrutiny:
One question means everything...........
"Will temperatures stop when emissions stop?"
Then we'll know if NetZero2050 can work.
This question, the most important in the entire climate debate
is addressed on this website.
Authorities and experts are asked to answer.
Everyone must study the issue and have an opinion.
The next elections could decide everything.
It depends on YOU whether we win or lose.
No issue has been so important in human history.
Just YOU: You can't continue to be a sleepwalker:
When scientists land on a lifeless planet in 20,000 years
a comprehensive scientific report will be written:
§1 The end of civilization can be explained by the fact that
tens of thousands scientists and professors in the IPCC failed to
complete the simple task of determining the correct
climate sensitivity in year 2021. Most of them knew the truth
but GroupThink dominated. This made politics and conclusions in
climate work did not reflect reality.
§2 The press and media at the time, saw the IPCC as the earth's only chance
to unite the world. The weight of tens of thousands of professors and the weight of
the Nobel Prize to the IPCC made the press forget its own press ethics
rules. It missed any critical scrutiny. These psychological
factors can be likened to a drunken state. And yet the people of the world
had some guidance from the 2,000-year-old wisdom:
REV18-3 For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of
her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed
fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed
rich through the abundance of her delicacies.
§3 The climate sensitivity =cs, is the number of degrees by which the
global temperature rises when carbon dioxide levels double.
All planets the size of the Earth, such as Venus, have cs= 20-40
for CO2. Therefore, it is a paradox how the IPCC could claim cs=3
during the Earth's most critical 40 years, until 2025.
Among other things, this allowed fossil fuels to be used for 100 years longer
than would have been possible with the right climate sensitivity.
Climate sensitivity cs=3 thus became the final trap.
§4 Our civilization now in the year 22,025 could easily have handled
the situation of nanotechnology-based gas separation
needed in year 2025.
Earth's dilemma in 2025 was that those in power lacked the knowledge
and those who had the knowledge reported no knowledge
because they calculated the wrong climate sensitivity, cs=3.
It is far from the true value cs = 20-40.
Thus the world lacked true knowledge of the real climate situation and
climate policy became woefully ineffective, especially the NetZero concept.
As a result, all the resources and money were invested precisely where
they would do the least good. No one understood how critical it was
to develop nanotechnology-based gas separation.
If only this had been understood, the Earth would easily have had the
resources to develop this as quickly as Covid vaccines were developed
By then, much of the energy crisis and much of the water crisis
would have been solved at the same time. But 99.7% of the resources
went to useless bureaucracy and corruption and 0.3 % went to technology
needed to save the world.
The root of the whole problem was that the IPCC told the world wrong
climate sensitivity. Civilization went down the drain with a speed
that no one could have imagined in 2021.
The right climate sensitivity would show that the climate crisis was
36/3 = 12 times more powerful than anyone could have imagined
living in the cs=3 world.