Open letter to parliament and climate experts

2021-0909

Honourable Member of Parliament or Climate Expert,

My new book is out today.

It will also apperar in english very soon.

clip4913

Background: at the start of the 2008 Global Forum in Stockholm, with many of the world's leaders gathered,
my innovation was highlighted as perhaps Sweden's most interesting climate innovation.

clip4914

 
Even IPCC's President Mohan Munasinghe was pleased to include my innovation in his speech.

clip4915

Since I have spent decades making complex thermodynamic calculations about new innovations and built data simulations, it was natural to look at the climate as well.

Thanks to the Global Forum, I got in touch with Mohan Munasinghe, described my findings about the climate and thus alerted the top management of the IPCC in May 2008.

From the email to him, it is warned that the Earth continues to gain 0.023 C/year until +8C is reached if all emissions are stopped by 2010.

These emails are briefly available here
https://ppm.today/index.html?ipcc-mohan-munasinghe.htm

 
My book warns of exactly the same thing...but now it's faster...

that the earth will continue with 0.035 C/year (=NASA) until +25C is reached 700 years later if all emissions are stopped by 2021.

 
The book proves why the IPCC is as wrong in its latest report in 2021 as they were in 2008. The IPCC report puts our whole world in existential danger. This IPCC curve is particularly dangerous because it describes that the Earth's temperature rise will stop when emissions stop.

clip4916

It is quite easy to understand that the IPCC is wrong. The Earth has 3000 Gt "too much" CO2 in the atmosphere

or 400 tonnes per person on Earth. It is this colossal amount that our

earth to +25 C in a process that lasts 25/0.035 = 700 years. On the way up, scientists are now discussing

whether catastrophe occurs at +1.5 or +2C. My book leads in proving that these temperatures are reached in 2027 and 2034 respectively.

Theresults can only be obtained if the correct climate sensitivity = 36 is assumed.

The IPCC and SMHI cannot even calculate this because they have not yet recognised true climate sensitivity=36

The world's total annual emissions correspond to about 1% of this colossal amount. Moreover, it takes

700 years for a change to have its full temperature impact. Whatever we do between now and 2050

change will be barely measurable. Therefore, Zero Emissions 2045is  ineffective and the IPCC presents

a false and dangerous curve. If we are fooled by this, it will be too late to correct

when everyone sees that the policy will not work in a few years. We can easily figure out a true picture now.

The only workable solution lies in taking a completely different approach. If 200 Gt of CO2 or

2 Gt of methane is sucked out of the atmosphere per year, we will just meet the Paris Agreement

and then have completely repaired the atmosphere within 20 years. The amount of methane

that needs to be removed is the best possible fuel with an economic value that is

100 to 1000 times higher than Norway's oil revenues. The countries that participate can easily double

Using simple rules of thumb, it can be roughly estimated that the revenue from methane

pay the entire bill for cleaning up all the CO2.

400,000 per person in the world. If Sweden is to assume its responsibilities in relation to its wealth

then the debt to the climate is about 4 million SEK per person. This debt can be solved in an elegantway.

When the atmosphere is repaired in 2040, every home will have free energy from the atmosphere's methane.

and the best fuel imaginable for the car. Super-entrepreneur Vinod Khosla gets

right when he predicted in 2014 that electric cars won't leave a significant mark

in the history books. We need solutions that are infinitely better and also

cheap. The future could be absolutely fantastic, or a bottomless misery if we follow Zero Emissions 2045.

Unfortunately, it is forbidden to discuss all the fantastical ways out that exist.

That's because all such solutions, which will be our salvation, lie outside Groupthink.

and are furiously opposed by Groupthink academics, scientists and politicians.

That's the way it's always been.

The above extraction of CO2 and Methane was discussed in April 2015 at Chalmers / Graphene

and scientists gave the thumbs up for how graphene could be used to separate gases.

All this was at the behest of the Swedish Government, to find Sweden's main direction

In my opinion, this could be the most important nanotechnology research

most important project in Sweden. It could solve the ENTIRE climate crisis and the entire country's energy supply.

and it could provide an unprecedented economic boost. Everything was swept under the carpet by

TheSwedish Energy Agency, which was present during the conference and made a lot of notes.

Repeated requests to the Energy Agency have not resulted in a response.

If we are to survive the climate crisis, thinking must change quickly and decisively.

NASA's latest alarm that the oceans will absorb twice as much energy in 14 years
can be translated into this prediction:
The Earth is warming by 0.07 C/year until +50 C is reached if all emissions are stopped by 2035

When you factor in this very latest from NASA, the forecast for the coming years looks like this.

The mathematical proof is at the back of the book.

If we emit twice as much or nothing at all, the curve looks almost exactly the same.

That's because next year's emissions are so small compared to what's already there and

the time between CO2 change and full temperature response is 700 years. The IPCC and SMHI cannot

even calculate this because true climate sensitivity=36

clip4917

I made a prediction in 2008 with the correct climate sensitivity=36 and it turned out perfectly

until 2021, while the IPCC failed completely for this period *Ref)

Shall I beat the IPCC once again with the above forecast until 2040 ?

He who lives will see.

Thus it is clear that Zero Emissions 2045 is a policy that can only solve
1% of the climate crisis. The remaining 99% is not even discussed. It must not be discussed because

it is outside of GroupThink.

Zero Emissions 2045 is an ineffective cheat-solution and an insult to our children.
This cannot be swept under the carpet any longer.

 
Previously, +4C was thought to be harmless. Now we know that even +1.5 C is a disaster from a number of points of view:

TheGuardian yesterday:

More than 230 journals warn 1.5°C of global warming could be 'catastrophic' for health
By Angela Dewan, CNN Updated 0010 GMT (0810 HKT) September 6, 2021

TheGuardian today. Tipping point may be closer than we think. Current plans aren't working.

Sweden must reach political agreement on a workable climate policy well before Glasgow.
This is our last chance. We have a few weeks to react.

 
The book: an action plan for Sweden is the first ever plan to
describes the only workable, innovative way forward for climate solutions
when Zero Emissions 2045 comes crashing down like a house of cards in the coming weeks under the weight of the laws of nature.

The action plan is a quality solution. It's expensive, but we can do this.

Three scientists have, in my opinion, written the best climate article ever,
recommended by Greta and read by millions.

In English

They write:

Together, we three authors of this article must have spent more
than 80 years thinking about climate change. Why has it taken us so
tosee the obvious dangers of the net-zero concept?
(Zero Emissions 2045) In our defence, the premise of net-zero is
deceptively simple - and we admit it fooled us.

These scientists were probably the first in the world to see these connections. Now it's time
for all scientists and politicians to step forward and say:

 
"We admit that we have been duped by the IPCC.

We prefer saving our young people to saving our prestige.

We are in good company with the three very eminent scientists who have shown the way

to the truth. Now we can start working on solutions that really work."

The age of wishful thinking is over.
A workable climate policy must be on the table long before Glasgow.
This is our last chance.

Best regards

Bengt Ovelius

bengt@ppm.today

ppm.today

*Ref)

IPCC forecast for the same period based on wrong climate sensitivity=3.

A forecast (high confidence !) - blue sign - that everyone knows by heart and that

shaped bill 2016/17:146 and climate law 2017:720:

Hard to beat this - miscounting 60 years on a 100-year period

and to achieve that nobody talks about it and that the press does not write about this.

Black: NASA real temperature Red: everyone probably agrees today that this is a pretty accurate forecast

clip4918

PS

I've been saying since 2008: everyone will be happy if I'm wrong, even me. But banning all discussion can't be forgiven. Now the discussion has to start.

Don't listen to me ! Listen to the laws of nature.

The end of the book proves my assertions mathematically. Here we follow the laws of nature with mathematical precision.

To the experts: point out any errors or change climate policy quickly.

The laws of nature are stronger than the laws of climate. The laws of nature do not negotiate. We must humbly submit.